Não estou a entender então.
o gajo diz que as razões para o rating ter sido baixado estão erradas.
Não discordo dele. Independemente de o rating ser merecido ou não as razões para os baixar tem de fazer sentido, obviamente.
O gajo fundamenta a opinião com situações passadas com ele. Que são idiotas, incompetentes etc.
Eu digo o mesmo mas passo a mesma ideia para todas as agencias de rating.
Depois o gajo diz isto noutro post:
Quote:
This is silly. “Wall Street,” by which Baker means the major banks, has very little sway over the 87 Tea Party freshmen. It’s the GOP freshmen who are currently the key constituency in the debt ceiling negotiations, and if anything, most of them would take pride in rejecting impassioned pleas from JPMorgan and Goldman Sachs. The idea that the major banks can just snap their fingers and get the Tea Party freshmen to drop their debt ceiling demands is beyond ridiculous. The Tea Party freshmen are thoroughly crazy, and there’s no telling what they’ll do. But if you think they’re all tools of Wall Street, then you simply haven’t been paying attention.
Ele nesse post dá uma bicadita no Tea Party.
Hum...
Tão mas...
Tea Party.... Libertários... Ele já pode dizer que são idiotas?