Sem duvida. E por isso que estas a equivaler Romney = balls out cientific progress para Obama = ZOMG STAGNATION
Vamos la ver o que o Romney diz, por exemplo nas stem cells
Quote:
Larry King: Your wife has multiple sclerosis, a disease some scientists think will be cured through stem cell research. How is she doing?
Mitt Romney: She's doing terrifically well. She's riding horses on a regular basis. She thinks that keeps her healthy and strong. And she's one of the few that has had very little progression from the disease. So I'm pleased and hopeful.
LR: Do you support the stem cell thing?
Romney: I support stem cell research. I do not support creating new embryos for the purpose of taking away the life of that embryo, and taking stem cells from those embryos. There are a lot of better ways than getting stem cells from --
LR: Even though they're probably never going to be lives?
Romney: If you create them in the laboratory, you're creating new life. And I wouldn't do that for the purpose of research, but there are fortunately much better ways of doing it, which has now been proven by scientists across the country.
LR: Do you think we're going to cure MS?
Romney: I sure hope so. I think eventually we'll be curing most of the major diseases we know during our lifetimes. But when these things get cured, that's going to be a long time down the roa
Ah sim... apoia, do género os jeovás com as transfusões de sangue "ah e tal somos a favor da medicina, mas os médicos dizem que transusões de sangue não são as melhores soluções".
Certo...
Então diz-me lá onde é que a investigasção cientifica sobre o Romney seria tão melhor, quando a bse dele, se opõe a quase qualquer coisa que venha de lá, especialmente de fundos federais (que é de onde vem uma boa parte da pesquisa cientifica)?
